Is that heading a statement, probably pejorative in nature, or is it a question without the question mark? What’s that – you think it’s a statement? How typical (which ‘tis nobler confirms is not a question). Sorry, that sounded unintentionally pejorative, which is not typical of ‘tis nobler.
And, with your interest in experiential learning and behavioural change (why else would you be reading this?), it’s not typical of you either.
But what is typical, particularly when most of these judgements concern ‘global’ concepts, concepts that may have concrete definitions that mask their abstract nature? Are you a typical teenager? Are you a typical learner? Are you typical of those trying to change their behaviour? Are you a typical driver? Are you typical?
The short answer to these questions is that people regard others who are similar to themselves as typical. You are typical if you are like me for I like to regard myself as typical – I fit the ‘model’, I am the archetype. There’s an interesting interplay going on here:
If you are like me, you are typical (for I consider myself the standard), and/or
If I like you (or what you are doing), you are typical (for I consider myself to be or do exactly like that too).
As Jamie Foxx sings in the song ‘Just Like Me’ – You’re just like me and I’m just like you …… How typical. How typical?
Think about and through the possible processes going on. There may be elements of efficient pattern matching intertwined with perceptions of personal qualities that are influenced by self esteem in this judgement process. It seems that concluding that someone else is typical is typically complicated. The implications of this process can be equally complicated when you think about ‘Islands’:
There is evidence that, if I think you are similar to me and you are behaving poorly, I am more likely to behave poorly. Further, if I think you are dissimilar to me and you are behaving poorly, I am less likely to behave poorly. In both these cases, I don’t need to know anything about you other than your level of similarity.
Assuming someone is typical because they are like you is typical. Of course, people are books but you can only see their ‘covers’ in judging whether they are typical or not.
Do you judge a book by its cover? How typical is this cover of the book? Does your pattern matching transcend the cover? Based on the way you answer these questions, should ‘tis nobler apply the statement, the question or both?
How typical. How typical?