November 28th, 2011 | Specific | 0 Comments
It’s not so much a foolish week at ‘tis nobler this week as a fooling week. Think of this week’s theme then as ‘tisfoolery’. The first post raises an interesting ‘chicken and egg’ question; sometimes, cause and effect does not always operate in the direction it appears to. Untangling cause from effect, effect from cause and effect as cause of a subsequent effect is a constant challenge, especially when these causal relationships are accompanied by a host of correlates that muddy the water. Correlates rarely clarify, and never cause.
And carousels only circle, but whether they circle as a cause, effect or correlate is a matter of some conjecture for your experience of them can be ‘deceptive’:
The real point for presenting this video was to illustrate the circular nature of deception and the many other elements that swirl around this process. An effect can be described but this description is usually limited to the effect, a linear process that begins with ‘this happened’ and ends with ‘this is what happened’. And the line continues.
An effect can be explained and this explanation transcends the effect, a non-linear process that begins with ‘this happened’ and ends with ‘this is what happened, this is why it happened and this is what it means’. And the behavioural ‘space’ is unpacked and re-packed.
But much of what we do falls between description and explanation for the former is too glib and the latter requires too much effort. Welcome to the land of the pretend explanation, a land overrun by justifications, rationalisations, opinions, bias, strategies and stratagems. In this land, the aim is to prevail rather than understand.
And it is here where deceit and deception can run rampant.
At some times, we deceive others and then believe our deceit to be true. At other times, we deceive ourselves in order to better deceive others. And then we deceive ourselves yet ignore the consequences of our self-deception, or we ‘pretend explain’ these consequences by compounding self-deception. There is compelling evidence that (self-) deception can be a powerful influence on our own behaviour and the ways in which we interact with others.
But it’s not really a question of causes and effects, of lines and directions. It’s a question of circles.
It’s worth remembering that there’s a lot of (self-) deception going around. Who are you fooling?