November 16th, 2011 | Specific | 0 Comments
Who is exactly like you? While a range of criteria could be used to answer this question, let’s just use one – standards.
As individuals, we have standards. Some of these standards are personal, others are broadly normative and yet others are societal. In descending order of importance (from the personal to the societal), these standards help to define us.
As members of a small group, we have standards. Some of these standards remain personal, others reflect specific group norms. Broadly normative and societal standards also remain in place.
As members of a larger group, we have standards. Some of these standards reflect specific group norms, while broadly normative and societal standards remain in place. Did you notice the change?
In the previous post, the relationship between anonymity and aberration was explored in general terms – with anonymity comes aberration. But, as groups get larger, our personal standards recede further and further into the distance. Does this indicate that there are degrees of anonymity? Is it possible for the personal to disappear completely within the impersonal group? The evidence supports the notion of disappearance.
Anonymity breeds aberration and the more anonymous you believe you are, the more aberrant your behaviour becomes. In large groups, you can scan the sea of faces trying to find someone like you:
And realise, perhaps ashamedly, that they are all like you and you are like all of them. Situations overwhelm standards and inhibitions disappear as your personal standards depart. Due to the situation and the behaviour of others, you become someone like you and not someone exactly like you.
What does it take to be exactly like you across situations and within groups? Only you can answer that question. It is essential to realise, though, that self management doesn’t cease simply because you’re with others!